MY PEOPLE, MY CRY
Reminiscing the past and hoping
for the future
The concept of Development in the world is debatable.
Regardless of all this, at the heart of the concept of ‘development’ are the
notions of improvement or betterment (Willis, 2016). The author then further
reflects that, these days, development theories seek to explain development
processes and development inequalities based on particular definitions of
development.
Reflection
In the developing
countries like Papua New Guinea, development and development projects are all
defined by the World Bank and other International institutions. Development in
this beautiful nation is powerfully described as a huge tidal wave from the
West crashing on the Melanesian society (Narakobi, 1980). The Melanesians were
not even prepared for the change. One prominent academic lamented the fact that
the people right throughout this beautiful nation even to the fringes should be
helped to understand this new gigantic waves framed by Christianity and
Colonialism (Nekitel, 1989).
Nevertheless, this cry is still ringing from the ages and it is exceptionally
true for the people of Aitape and Lumi.
Aitape Lumi peoples’ cry of the years gone by since
independence has reflected the district’s engagement in only a similar form of
development. This development comes in the form of foreign companies extracting
natural resources from the local villages.
For Aitape (both East & West LLG areas), logging
industry very much dominated the area. These logging companies operate using
different permits, some under the guise of SABL (agro-forest projects), others
using road permits, yet others empowered by peoples' ILGs have engaged in
logging activities that are illegal in nature (Numapo, 2013).
For Lumi, others of similar nature are in operation at
various scales. One of the recent project since the late 90s is the Tree
Kangaroo Conservation project. Through the signing of 'Moratorium (temporary
agreement to stop hunting Tree Kangaroos), the project since then has
significantly grown to a new level (Tenkile Conservation Alliance, 2017).
A local person’s development reflection
With this brief description of the Aitape-Lumi district’s
development cry of the ages, there are certain vital development points that
are essential to foster development and mitigate underdevelopment.
Secondly the cry from the past has indicated
explicitly that the discussed form of development includes a lot of third
parties. In this context, the people, who are the primary stakeholders- for
whose interest the projects, are undertaken at most times became spectators.
They have lost their rights over their own land and have become strangers in their
own paradise home.
Furthermore, such development practices and models
serve various interests because a lot of unnecessary partners are in
partnership.
The probe
These thoughts lead to a new
probing question of, “how can we maximize development benefit to the people and
make it more sustainable?” A recent discussion
in development reveals that the key lies in the need to consider the culture
and views of the people in the community which is the vital cog or the key to
any initiative designed to benefit the people (Astanga, 2018).
So for development and any
initiatives to be successful, people’s perspectives, conceptualizations and
knowledge on development is very importation. There should be equal and ample
contribution by the communities before any development project is carried out.
When considering indigenous
peoples’ (landowners) perspective, culture is also another factor that should
be considered as it is integral to development and could not be separated (Marana,
2010). It is indeed a vital element in any development practice that is
connected to the people. It is also important to note that culture itself is
not static but is dynamic and is fluid and changes every time people interact
with one another (Hermes, 2014).
Concluding thoughts
In
reminiscing the past and hoping for the future, a Wape and Aitape person is
naturally a Melanesian. It is clear in his culture that they as a people are a communal
people. They strive to collectively make their communities better. Yes, the cry
from the past is a reaction to the deep wounds caused by ignorance and negligence
of their own ways in their quest to adapt and adopt the foreign notions of
development. The future is now, let the Wape and Aitape man put aside Western
notion of individualism which is destroying him and start building himself from
within.
"BOTTOM UP- COMMUNITY BASED MODEL OF DEVELOPMENT IS THE WAY FOWARD"
Reference
Astanga,
F. A. (June, 2018). Development expert want public perception of development
changed. Ghana News Agency. Retrieved
from https://search/proquest.com/docview/2057530779?accountid=191104
Hermes,
K. L. (2014). Yumi olgeta papua niugini: cultural identity formations and
national consciousness among urban-educated youth in Papua New Guinea
(Doctoral dissertation, [Honolulu]:[University of Hawaii at Manoa],[December
2014]). Retrieved from https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/101225/Hermes_Karin_r.pdf
Marana, M.
(2010). Culture and Development: Evolution and prospects.
Narokobi,
B. (1980). The Melanesian way: Total cosmic vision of life. Institute of
Papua New Guinea Studies.
Nekitel, O. (1989). Communicating the concepts of
development. In C. Thirlwall and P.J.Huges (Eds.), The ethics of development: Language, communication and power (pp. 57-61). Port Moresby, PNG :
University of Papua New Guinea Press.
Numapo, J.
(2013). Commission of inquiry into special agricultural and business leases
(SABL) final report. Retrieved from https://www.coi.pg.
Tenkile
Conservation Alliance. (2017). Tree kangaroo. Retrieved from http://www.tenkile.com
Willis, K.
(2016). Development theory. doi: 10.1093/OBO/9780199874002-0007


No comments:
Post a Comment